From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Feb 9, 2015
Case No.: 3:14cv195/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 9, 2015)

Summary

In Jones, the Eleventh Circuit recognized that "[t]he Supreme Court has twice considered - and twice rejected - an Ex Post Facto challenge to a state's increase in the interval between parole reviews."

Summary of this case from Courtney v. Coonrod

Opinion

Case No.: 3:14cv195/MCR/EMT

02-09-2015

KAYLE SMITH, Petitioner, v. JULIE L. JONES, Respondent.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 13, 2015. (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 18) is GRANTED IN PART as follows:

a. Respondent's motion is GRANTED as to Grounds One through Five, Nine through Eleven, and Thirteen of Petitioner's habeas petition (doc. 1); and

b. Respondent motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice as to Ground Twelve of Petitioner's habeas petition.

3. Grounds One through Eleven and Thirteen of Petitioner's habeas petition (doc. 1) are DISMISSED with prejudice.

4. The matter is hereby remanded to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings on Ground Twelve of Petitioner's habeas petition.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of February 2015.

/s/ _________

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Feb 9, 2015
Case No.: 3:14cv195/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 9, 2015)

In Jones, the Eleventh Circuit recognized that "[t]he Supreme Court has twice considered - and twice rejected - an Ex Post Facto challenge to a state's increase in the interval between parole reviews."

Summary of this case from Courtney v. Coonrod
Case details for

Smith v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:KAYLE SMITH, Petitioner, v. JULIE L. JONES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 9, 2015

Citations

Case No.: 3:14cv195/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 9, 2015)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Williams

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), petitioner was required to file his § 2254 petition within one year of the date…

Roberts v. Owens

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), Roberts was required to file his § 2254 petition within one year of the date…