From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Mar 13, 2008
ACTION No. 06-1256 MLB (D. Kan. Mar. 13, 2008)

Summary

awarding four hours for a reply brief that "merely reiterated plaintiff's allegations, stated the Commissioner's response . . . , and explained why, in plaintiff's view, plaintiff's argument should be preferred"

Summary of this case from Honeycutt v. Colvin

Opinion

ACTION No. 06-1256 MLB.

March 13, 2008


ORDER


Ten days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by the magistrate judge John Thomas Reid, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b), the court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Mar 13, 2008
ACTION No. 06-1256 MLB (D. Kan. Mar. 13, 2008)

awarding four hours for a reply brief that "merely reiterated plaintiff's allegations, stated the Commissioner's response . . . , and explained why, in plaintiff's view, plaintiff's argument should be preferred"

Summary of this case from Honeycutt v. Colvin
Case details for

Smith v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BILLY G. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Mar 13, 2008

Citations

ACTION No. 06-1256 MLB (D. Kan. Mar. 13, 2008)

Citing Cases

Honeycutt v. Colvin

The reply here is somewhat repetitive, repeating some of the same arguments and record citations contained in…