From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skolnik v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2004
13 A.D.3d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-09899.

December 6, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered September 25, 2003, which denied that branch of her motion which was, in effect, to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Before: Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by adding to the decretal paragraph thereof the words "as unnecessary" after the word "denied"; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, is directed to schedule a conference date before the assigned Justice immediately upon being served with a copy of this decision and order by the appellant's attorney.

By decision and order on motion dated April 6, 2004, this Court dismissed an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court dated June 30, 2003, which purported to dismiss the complaint in this action. As no order was entered upon the decision, the Supreme Court's ruling as embodied therein was without effect ( see Petrie v. Petrie, 144 AD2d 549, citing Talcott Factors v. Larfred, Inc., 115 AD2d 397, 400). Accordingly, that branch of the appellant's motion which was, in effect, to restore the action to the trial calendar was unnecessary.


Summaries of

Skolnik v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2004
13 A.D.3d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Skolnik v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA SKOLNIK, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. METRO-NORTH COMMUTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
786 N.Y.S.2d 100

Citing Cases

Natan 5 LLC v. Weekes

This is a separate issue from whether the order is enforceable or appealable, neither of which can be sought…

Enhanced Acquisitions II, LLC v. Sarla Sai, LLC

If a party fails to file any papers required to be filed under this subdivision, the order may be vacated as…