From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simon v. Usher

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 1, 2012
93 A.D.3d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-1

Allen SIMON, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Sol M. USHER, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman, Mackauf, Bloom & Rubinowitz, New York (Rhonda E. Kay of counsel), for appellants. Kopff, Nardelli & Dopf LLP, New York (Martin B. Adams of counsel), for Sol M. Usher, Sol M. Usher, M.D., P.C., F.A.C.S., Maxwell M. Chait, Hartsdale Medical Group, P.C., and White Plains Hospital Center, respondents.


Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman, Mackauf, Bloom & Rubinowitz, New York (Rhonda E. Kay of counsel), for appellants. Kopff, Nardelli & Dopf LLP, New York (Martin B. Adams of counsel), for Sol M. Usher, Sol M. Usher, M.D., P.C., F.A.C.S., Maxwell M. Chait, Hartsdale Medical Group, P.C., and White Plains Hospital Center, respondents.

Rende, Ryan & Downes, LP, White Plains (Roland T. Koke of counsel), for Sheldon Alter, Mid–Westchester Medical Associates, LLP, The Westchester Medical Group, P.C. and Marianne Monahan, respondents.

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals (17 N.Y.3d 625, 934 N.Y.S.2d 362, 958 N.E.2d 540 [2011] ), order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (MaryAnn Brigantti–Hughes, J.), entered October 27, 2009, which, in a medical malpractice action, granted the motion of the Usher defendants and defendants Chait, Hartsdale Medical Group, P.C., and White Plains *888 Hospital Center to change venue from Bronx County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion to change venue was properly granted upon the grounds that, except for defendants Usher and Usher, M.D., P.C., all of the defendants and plaintiffs reside in Westchester County, and that while Usher, M.D., P.C., maintains a satellite office in Bronx County that it rents one day per month, Usher's primary office is located in Westchester County, the office where plaintiff was treated. Thus, movants met their initial burden of establishing that the Bronx County venue chosen by plaintiffs is improper (CPLR 503[a]; 510[1]; Hernandez v. Seminatore, 48 A.D.3d 260, 851 N.Y.S.2d 172 [2008] ), and since plaintiffs forfeited their right to select the venue by choosing an improper venue in the first instance, venue is properly placed in Westchester County, where most of the parties reside ( Weiss v. Wal–Mart Stores E., L.P., 83 A.D.3d 461, 919 N.Y.S.2d 848 [2011] ).

GONZALEZ, P.J., TOM, RENWICK, DeGRASSE, ABDUS–SALAAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Simon v. Usher

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 1, 2012
93 A.D.3d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Simon v. Usher

Case Details

Full title:Allen SIMON, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Sol M. USHER, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 1, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1544
938 N.Y.S.2d 887

Citing Cases

Mishqui v. Bemini Constr. Corp.

Defendant Bernini has failed to meet its burden to establish that plaintiffs choice of Bronx County was…

Catania v. John C. Goodfellow Enters.

Defendants met their initial burden of establishing that the venue in this matter was improper. which was…