From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siegel v. Lepore

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 17, 2000
234 F.3d 1162 (11th Cir. 2000)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that the absence of a substantial likelihood of irreparable injury, standing alone, makes preliminary injunctive relief improper

Summary of this case from Davis v. Bryant
See 5 Summaries

Opinion

No. 00-15981.

November 17, 2000.

Charles Box Jones, III, David Isaac Adelman, Teresa Wynn Roseborough, John H. Fleming, Carey P. DeDeyn, James A. Orr, Allegra J. Lawrence, C. Francis Whitaker, III, Sutherland, Asbill Brennan, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 00-9009-CV-DMM); Donald M. Middlebrooks, Judge.

Order on Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal.

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Appellants' Emergency Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons set out in the order entered today in No. 00-15985, Touchston v. Mcdermott, 234 F.3d 1161.

Summaries of

Siegel v. Lepore

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 17, 2000
234 F.3d 1162 (11th Cir. 2000)

holding that the absence of a substantial likelihood of irreparable injury, standing alone, makes preliminary injunctive relief improper

Summary of this case from Davis v. Bryant

noting that "the asserted irreparable injury 'must be neither remote nor speculative, but actual and imminent'"

Summary of this case from Wilson v. Harrell

emphasizing "the asserted irreparable injury 'must be neither remote nor speculative, but actual and imminent.'"

Summary of this case from Hernandez v. Inch

emphasizing "the asserted irreparable injury 'must be neither remote nor speculative, but actual and imminent.'"

Summary of this case from McDonald v. Fountain

emphasizing that "the asserted irreparable injury 'must be neither remote nor speculative, but actual and imminent'"

Summary of this case from Davis v. Bryant
Case details for

Siegel v. Lepore

Case Details

Full title:Ned L. SIEGEL, Georgette Sosa Douglas, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 17, 2000

Citations

234 F.3d 1162 (11th Cir. 2000)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Bryant

Davis's asserted justification for injunctive relief—that it is possible that Defendants Bryant, Bowman and…

Wilson v. Harrell

Plaintiff has, at best, articulated a speculative fear of harm, not a likelihood of suffering irreparable…

6 Citing Cases