From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shubert v. Manheim Auctions, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3365 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 18, 2010)

Summary

including treble damages available under Pennsylvania law in amount in controversy analysis

Summary of this case from Hardig v. Certainteed Corp.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3365.

February 18, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this _____ day of February, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion to remand (docket no. 12), defendants' response thereto, and plaintiff's supplemental memorandum in support thereof, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) the motion to remand is GRANTED;
(2) the above-captioned action is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania; and
(3) plaintiff's request for an award of attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Shubert v. Manheim Auctions, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3365 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 18, 2010)

including treble damages available under Pennsylvania law in amount in controversy analysis

Summary of this case from Hardig v. Certainteed Corp.
Case details for

Shubert v. Manheim Auctions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN M. SHUBERT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 18, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3365 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 18, 2010)

Citing Cases

Hardig v. Certainteed Corp.

In analyzing the amount in controversy for cases removed under CAFA, treble damages, when demanded, must be…

Boyd v. Burlington Coat Factory of Pa., LLC

Whether a defendant was properly served is a question of state law. See Shubert v. Manheim Auctions, Inc.,…