From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shipley v. First Federal Sav. Bank

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 23, 1989
877 F.2d 57 (3d Cir. 1989)

Summary

holding that a bank and attorney who filed a foreclosure action were not acting under color of state law for purposes of § 1983

Summary of this case from Talley v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.

Opinion

No. 89-3072.

May 23, 1989.

D.Del., Roth, J., 703 F.Supp. 1122.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Shipley v. First Federal Sav. Bank

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 23, 1989
877 F.2d 57 (3d Cir. 1989)

holding that a bank and attorney who filed a foreclosure action were not acting under color of state law for purposes of § 1983

Summary of this case from Talley v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.

holding that bank and attorney who filed foreclosure action against real property did not engage in state action for purposes of § 1983

Summary of this case from Nanya-Nashut v. Centex Home Equity Corp.

holding Bank and attorney who filed foreclosure action against real property did not engage in state action for purposes of Section 1983

Summary of this case from Nanya-Nashut, ex rel Hand v. Bankone

affirming district court's holding that a private bank, even if found to be a state actor, “would still be entitled to assert a defense of qualified immunity”

Summary of this case from Duhon v. Healthcare Professionals' Found. of La.
Case details for

Shipley v. First Federal Sav. Bank

Case Details

Full title:Shipley v. First Federal Sav. Bank and Loan Ass'n of Delaware

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: May 23, 1989

Citations

877 F.2d 57 (3d Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Zebrowski v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Defendant points to three district court cases supporting this contention. See Nanya-Nashut ex rel. Hand v.…

Troutt v. Peoples National Bank

Numerous courts, including the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, have held that banks are private actors which…