From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shields v. California

U.S.
Mar 22, 2004
541 U.S. 930 (2004)

Summary

vacating the judgment and remanding for reconsideration in light of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (holding that the Sixth Amendment requires unavailability of a witness and a prior opportunity for cross-examination before testimonial evidence — including police interrogations — can be admitted against a criminal defendant)

Summary of this case from Johnson v. McGrath

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT.

No. 03-7276.

March 22, 2004.


Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Crawford v. Washington, ante, p. 36. Reported below: 108 Cal. App. 4th 469, 133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 489.


Summaries of

Shields v. California

U.S.
Mar 22, 2004
541 U.S. 930 (2004)

vacating the judgment and remanding for reconsideration in light of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (holding that the Sixth Amendment requires unavailability of a witness and a prior opportunity for cross-examination before testimonial evidence — including police interrogations — can be admitted against a criminal defendant)

Summary of this case from Johnson v. McGrath
Case details for

Shields v. California

Case Details

Full title:SHIELDS v. CALIFORNIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 22, 2004

Citations

541 U.S. 930 (2004)

Citing Cases

People v. Lessie

Indeed, the only relevant authority rejects exclusion as a remedy. ( People v.Castille (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th…

People v. Alvarez-Ramirez

But the Attorney General cites Williams, supra, 49 Cal.4th at pages 433-434; People v. Ashmus (1991) 54…