From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherrick v. Obstetrics & Gynecology Specialists, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Nov 7, 2018
924 N.W.2d 876 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018)

Summary

finding a physician's opinion was inadmissible because it did not relate to the care provided to the plaintiff

Summary of this case from McGrew v. Otoadese

Opinion

No. 17-0939

11-07-2018

Lauren SHERRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SPECIALISTS, P.C., Defendant-Appellee.

James K. Weston II of Tom Riley Law Firm, Iowa City, for appellant. Robert V.P. Waterman, Jr. and Trista M. Beise (until withdrawal) of Lane & Waterman, LLP, Davenport, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Sherrick v. Obstetrics & Gynecology Specialists, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Nov 7, 2018
924 N.W.2d 876 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018)

finding a physician's opinion was inadmissible because it did not relate to the care provided to the plaintiff

Summary of this case from McGrew v. Otoadese
Case details for

Sherrick v. Obstetrics & Gynecology Specialists, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:Lauren SHERRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Nov 7, 2018

Citations

924 N.W.2d 876 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

McGrew v. Otoadese

Unlike the factual situation in Hansen , the physicians did not arrive at their opinions as a necessary part…