finding that the district court lacked jurisdiction under § 46110 when the plaintiff did “not broadly challenge the constitutionality of the FAA's action,” and instead the “challenge [was] specific to the notice he received and inescapably intertwined with the procedures surrounding the FAA's order”

finding the fact that other applicants scored higher than the plaintiff on oral interviews legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for choosing not to hire plaintiff

affirming district court decision to grant summary judgment when Plaintiff relied on conclusory allegations and failed to introduce evidence to demonstrate that his emotional injuries were substantial or lasting

In Russell, the plaintiff failed to provide evidence as to the severity or frequency of her asthma attacks, nor did she explain how her asthma generally affected her life activities.