MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN W. DARRAH, District Judge

Plaintiff, Bonnie Shaffer, filed suit against Defendant, Combined Insurance Company of America ("Combined"). Summary judgment was granted to Defendant, and the case was dismissed. Now before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Costs and Bill of Costs. For the following reasons, that motion is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

A more detailed explanation of the facts is set out in this Court's November 18, 2003 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting summary judgment to Defendant. Shaffer v. Combined Ins. Co., No. 02 C 1774, 2003 WL 22715818 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2003).

LEGAL STANDARD

There is a strong presumption favoring the award of costs to the prevailing party. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Indus. Co., 126 F.3d 926, 945 (7th Cir. 1997) ("Weeks"). "The presumption is difficult to overcome, and the district court's discretion is narrowly confined — the court must award costs unless it states good reasons for denying them." Weeks, 126 F.3d at 945.

ANALYSIS

Defendant seeks costs for: (1) fees for service of summons, (2) fees of the court reporter for all or any part of the transcripts necessarily obtained for use in the case, (3) fees for copies of papers necessarily obtained in the case, (4) witness fees, and (5) docket fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1923. Plaintiff does not object to any of the costs sought by Defendant.

Here, Defendant seeks $405.00 for service of summons on nine people, at $45 per person served. "Prevailing parties may recover service costs that do not exceed the Marshal Service's fees regardless of who effected service. The Marshal's Service charges $40.00 for the first hour and $20.00 for every hour thereafter." Hall v. City of Chicago, No. 98 C 4682, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11220, at *7 (N.D. Ill. July 2, 2003) (citations omitted). In this case, Defendant failed to specify how long it took to effectuate service on each person. Therefore, Defendants may recover $40 per person served, for a total of $360.00.

Defendant next seeks $5,334.74 for transcripts necessarily obtained for use in the case. The costs of deposition transcripts "necessarily obtained for use in the case" are authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920(2). The "transcripts need not be absolutely indispensable in order to provide the basis of an award of costs; it is enough that they are `reasonably necessary.'" Barber v. Ruth, 7 F.3d 636, 645 (7th Cir. 1993). The Judicial Conference has established $3.30 as the rate per page for an original transcript, $0.83 per page for the first copy of a transcript, and $0.55 per page for each additional copy to the same party. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Roll Serv., Inc., No. 01 C 5292, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11221, at * 3 (N.D. Ill. July 2, 2003).

Included in this amount for transcript fees are hourly fees for court reporters. Moreover, court reporter attendance fees ranging from $16.00 per hour to $68.75 are reasonable. . . ." Hall v. City of Chicago, No. 98 C 4682, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11220, at *4 (N.D. Ill. July 2, 2003).

Here, Defendant seeks $3.30 per page for most of the original transcripts, and $3.05 for some original transcripts. Defendant further seeks $0.83 for each copy of the transcript. Lastly, Defendant requests $30.00, $35.00, and $50.00 per hour for hourly fees for court reporters. All these amounts are reasonable, and, therefore, Defendant may recover the full $5,334.74.

Defendant also requests $353.00 in fees for copies of papers necessarily obtained in the case. A party may recover costs of copies provided to the Court and opposing counsel; it cannot recover costs for its own use. Sharp v. United Airlines, 197 F.R.D. 361, 362 (N.D. Ill. 2000). Copy rates of $0.10 to $0.20 have been found to be reasonable. McDonald v. Village of Winnetka, No. 00 C 3199, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7204, at * 6 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 30, 2003).

In this case, Defendant seeks $0.10 per copy. Out of the total $353.00 Defendant seeks for copies, $225.30 are for copies filed with the Court, $31.10 are for copies of discovery documents, and $96.00 are for copies of miscellaneous documents obtained from third-parties. Defendant has also presented letters indicating these miscellaneous documents were given to Plaintiff. Accordingly, Defendant may recover the whole $353.00 requested.

Defendant further seeks $584.83 in witness fees for nine people. Payment to a witness may not exceed a $40.00 appearance fee, plus reasonable travel and subsistence charges. Herman v. Central States, S.E., S.W. Areas Pension Fund, No. 03 C 1010, 2003 WL 22955996, at * 4 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 15, 2003). Here, Defendant failed to present any evidence of the travel and subsistence charges accrued by each witness. Therefore, Defendant may only receive $40.00 for each witness, for a total of S360.00.

Lastly, Defendant seeks $128.00 for what appears to be docket fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1923. However, Defendant failed to provide any support as to why the docket fees were charged, what filings with which they are associated, and whether it actually seeks these docket fees. Accordingly, Defendant may not recover the requested $128.00.

CONCLUSION