From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shacket v. Township of Highland

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jan 29, 1969
166 N.W.2d 821 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)

Summary

In Shacket v. Township of Highland (1969), 15 Mich. App. 543, this Court was faced by almost the identical situation as here. The trial court in Shacket, supra, had issued a writ of mandamus peremptorily without taking testimony on the basis that as a matter of law the ordinance was invalid on its face.

Summary of this case from S. B. S. Builders, Inc. v. City of Madison Heights

Opinion

Docket No. 5,089.

Decided January 29, 1969. Rehearing granted April 1, 1969.

Appeal from Oakland, Beer (William John), J. Submitted Division 2 January 8, 1969, at Lansing. (Docket No. 5,089.) Decided January 29, 1969. Rehearing granted April 1, 1969.

Complaint by Maurice Shacket against the township of Highland, a municipal corporation, the township planning board and Harold Kinney, building inspector of Highland Township, for a writ of mandamus requiring defendant to issue plaintiff a building permit. Writ granted. Defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded.

Harry H. Mead, for plaintiff.

Dudley Patterson, for defendants.


Defendant appeals from the trial court's grant to plaintiff of a writ of mandamus requiring defendant to issue a building permit to plaintiff for development and construction of a mobile home park on plaintiff's land. The writ was granted peremptorily without the taking of testimony on the basis that as a matter of law the ordinance of defendant barred trailer parks completely from defendant township and was invalid on its face.

This ruling was erroneous. West Bloomfield Township v. Chapman (1958), 351 Mich. 606; June v. City of Lincoln Park (1960), 361 Mich. 95. The ordinance prohibition of trailer parks from defendant township may or may not be valid, depending on whether such a prohibition, as it relates to plaintiff's land, is reasonable or unreasonable. This determination is impossible without evidence.

Reversed and remanded for trial, without costs.

QUINN, P.J., and McGREGOR and V.J. BRENNAN, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Shacket v. Township of Highland

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jan 29, 1969
166 N.W.2d 821 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)

In Shacket v. Township of Highland (1969), 15 Mich. App. 543, this Court was faced by almost the identical situation as here. The trial court in Shacket, supra, had issued a writ of mandamus peremptorily without taking testimony on the basis that as a matter of law the ordinance was invalid on its face.

Summary of this case from S. B. S. Builders, Inc. v. City of Madison Heights
Case details for

Shacket v. Township of Highland

Case Details

Full title:SHACKET v. TOWNSHIP OF HIGHLAND

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 29, 1969

Citations

166 N.W.2d 821 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
166 N.W.2d 821

Citing Cases

Choe v. Flint Charter Township

Lorland Civic Ass'n v DiMatteo, 10 Mich. App. 129, 137; 157 N.W.2d 1 (1968). Nevertheless, despite the…

Abaco Finance, Inc v. Birmingham

This Court has held that whether there is a rational or legal justification for the ordinance depends upon…