From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shackelford v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1998
505 S.E.2d 80 (N.C. 1998)

Opinion

No. 561PA97

Filed 9 October 1998

On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 127 N.C. App. 449, 490 S.E.2d 578 (1997), affirming an order and judgment entered 10 April 1996 by Cashwell, J., in Superior Court, New Hanover County. Heard in the Supreme Court 28 September 1998.

Shipman Associates, L.L.P., by Gary K. Shipman and C. Wes Hodges, II, for petitioner-appellants.

Thomas C. Pollard, City Attorney, for respondent-appellee.

Adams Hendon Carson Crow Saenger, P.A., by Martin K. Reidinger, on behalf of the Good Neighbors Association of North Carolina, amicus curiae.

North Carolina League of Municipalities, by John M. Phelps, II, Assistant General Counsel, amicus curiae.


Justice Webb took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Shackelford v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1998
505 S.E.2d 80 (N.C. 1998)
Case details for

Shackelford v. City of Wilmington

Case Details

Full title:RONALD E. SHACKELFORD, et al., Petitioners v. CITY OF WILMINGTON…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1998

Citations

505 S.E.2d 80 (N.C. 1998)
505 S.E.2d 80

Citing Cases

Hayes v. Town of Fairmont

The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members…

Arquilla v. City of Salisbury

The trial court cites the following cases in Finding of Fact Number 18 in support of its classification based…