From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Serna v. Arde Apparel Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 19, 1995
657 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Summary

holding that dishonor of checks later sued upon is event giving rise to cause of action

Summary of this case from Hind-Marsh v. Puglia

Opinion

Nos. 94-2912, 94-2798.

July 19, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Philip Bloom, J.

Taylor, Brion, Buker Greene and Arnaldo Velez, Miami, for appellant.

Gest Stok and Alan B. Gest, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.


Under circumstances identical to those involved in Serna v. Milanese, Inc., 643 So.2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), the same person, Serna, who was president of the corporation, signed checks of Jemaros Investments, Inc., which were presented and dishonored in 1992. Accordingly, as we held in Serna, and as the trial court correctly held here, his liability was controlled and arose under section 673.403, Florida Statutes (1991), and was not affected by section 673.4021 (1993), which became effective on January 1, 1993. Because, however, the present action was not itself filed until June 29, 1993, Serna claims the inapplicability of the prior case because of its statement that "Milanese's substantive right to collect treble damages on the worthless checks under section 673.403(2) arose in September 1992, when it brought suit to enforce its right." Serna, 643 So.2d at 38 (emphasis supplied). We reject this contention.

It is apparent that the statement relied upon — which is purely dictum upon which nothing in that case turned — was no more than an inadvertent and legally incorrect slip of the word processor. It is settled law that legal rights accrue and are fixed, not when an action is brought to enforce them, but rather when "the last element necessary to constitute the cause of action occurs." Birnholz v. Blake, 399 So.2d 375, 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Envases Venezolanos v. Collazo, 559 So.2d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Since those operative events in this case — the dishonor of the worthless checks resulting in damages to the appellee — occurred before January 1, 1993, the holding of Serna directly applies.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Serna v. Arde Apparel Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 19, 1995
657 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

holding that dishonor of checks later sued upon is event giving rise to cause of action

Summary of this case from Hind-Marsh v. Puglia
Case details for

Serna v. Arde Apparel Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LUIS SERNA, APPELLANT, v. ARDE APPAREL, INC., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 19, 1995

Citations

657 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Tison v. Clairmont Condo. F Ass'n

"It is settled law that legal rights accrue and are fixed, not when an action is brought to enforce them, but…

Hind-Marsh v. Puglia

The relevant and controlling statute at the time the cause of action arose was section 673.403, Florida…