From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scull v. Hennegan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 31, 2017
15-CV-309-A (W.D.N.Y. May. 31, 2017)

Summary

overlooking movant's failure to include a statement of undisputed facts as required by the local rules and declining to deny a motion for summary judgment on that basis

Summary of this case from Browning v. Peters (In re Peters)

Opinion

15-CV-309-A

05-31-2017

JOHN T. SCULL, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK K. HENNEGAN, ROGER TREVINO and JOHN P. BARTOLOMEI, BRIAN DEL PORTO, NIAGARA FALLS REDEVELOPMENT LLC, 11TH STREET PROPERTIES LLC, CLARKSVILLE LAND COMPANY LLC, HOWARD MILSTEIN (Owner NFR), ANTHONY BERGAMO (President NFR), CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS NEW YORK, THOMAS G. EWING, Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On May 4, 2017, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 64), recommending that pro se defendant John Bartolomei's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 51) be granted in part, dismissing plaintiff's state law conspiracy claim against him, but otherwise denied, without prejudice.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, pro se defendant John Bartolomei's motion for summary judgment is granted in part, dismissing plaintiff's state law conspiracy claim against the defendant, but is otherwise denied, without prejudice. The case is remains referred to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for further proceedings consistent to the Court's prior Text Order Referring Case at Dkt. No. 8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: May 31, 2017


Summaries of

Scull v. Hennegan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 31, 2017
15-CV-309-A (W.D.N.Y. May. 31, 2017)

overlooking movant's failure to include a statement of undisputed facts as required by the local rules and declining to deny a motion for summary judgment on that basis

Summary of this case from Browning v. Peters (In re Peters)
Case details for

Scull v. Hennegan

Case Details

Full title:JOHN T. SCULL, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK K. HENNEGAN, ROGER TREVINO and JOHN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 31, 2017

Citations

15-CV-309-A (W.D.N.Y. May. 31, 2017)

Citing Cases

Browning v. Peters (In re Peters)

The record and the parties' submissions enable the Court to determine the undisputed facts and that the…