From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Bear Stearns Companies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1999
266 A.D.2d 133 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Summary

holding that securities transactions are outside the scope of Section 349

Summary of this case from In re Sterling Foster Co., Inc., Securities Lit.

Opinion

November 30, 1999

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered August 27, 1998, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Gregory E. Keller, for Plaintiff-Appellant,

Jonathan M. Hoff, for Defendants-Respondents.

ELLERIN, P.J., WILLIAMS, LERNER, RUBIN, SAXE, JJ.


The IAS Court properly dismissed plaintiff's cause of action underGeneral Business Law § 349 , since the securities transactions at issue are outside the scope of the statute (see, Smith v. Triad Mfg. Group, Inc., 255 A.D.2d 962, 964). In any event, defendants, as clearing brokers, had no duty to disclose to the introducing broker's clients, and thus the statutory cause of action, as well as the negligence claim, were properly dismissed (see, In re Blech Sec. Litig., 928 F. Supp. 1279, 1295-1296).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Bear Stearns Companies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1999
266 A.D.2d 133 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

holding that securities transactions are outside the scope of Section 349

Summary of this case from In re Sterling Foster Co., Inc., Securities Lit.

dismissing plaintiffs claims against Bear Stearns, the clearing broker, even though Bear Stearns was alleged to have had knowledge of fraud by introducing broker

Summary of this case from Lesavoy v. Lane
Case details for

Schwartz v. Bear Stearns Companies, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SCHWARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 133 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 855

Citing Cases

Lesavoy v. Lane

New York courts have further refused to hold clearing brokers liable for the practices of others even when…

Jang v. Sofi Sec. (In re Jan. 2021 Litig.)

Under New York law, clearing brokers like Apex generally don't owe individual investors any fiduciary duties.…