From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schroeder v. Bank of Am. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 24, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0589 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0589

01-24-2013

MARSHALL S. SCHROEDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORP. (BAC), GOLDBECK MCCAFFERTY & MCKEEVER, P.C., et al., Defendants.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARLSON)


ORDER

NOW, this 24th of January, 2013, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson (Doc. 22) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report & Recommendation (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED.
(2) The motions to dismiss the Complaint (Docs. 5; 8) are GRANTED.
(3) The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order. Failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of the action with prejudice.
(4) The matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings.

______________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Schroeder v. Bank of Am. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 24, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0589 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Schroeder v. Bank of Am. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARSHALL S. SCHROEDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORP. (BAC)…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0589 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 24, 2013)

Citing Cases

Pagano v. Ventures Tr. 2013-I-Hr

ugh "[a]n action in mortgage foreclosure is strictly an in rem proceeding," N.Y. Guardian Mortg. Corp. v.…

Mohammed v. Wells Fargo N.A.

dressing whether an adverse ruling in an in rem mortgage foreclosure action constitutes a "loss" for the…