From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schassar v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Oct 5, 2009
Case No: 08-2546-JWL (D. Kan. Oct. 5, 2009)

Summary

adopting September 18, 2009 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Cohn

Summary of this case from Beier v. Colvin

Opinion

Case No: 08-2546-JWL.

October 5, 2009


ORDER


On September 18, 2009, a Report and Recommendation (doc. 18) was issued by the Honorable Gerald B. Cohn, Magistrate Judge. The time in which to file objections has passed and to date no objections have been filed. The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds that it should be adopted

IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT that the Report and Recommendation (doc. 18) is adopted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Judgment, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (doc. 7) is denied as improperly filed and judgment is entered in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schassar v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Oct 5, 2009
Case No: 08-2546-JWL (D. Kan. Oct. 5, 2009)

adopting September 18, 2009 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Cohn

Summary of this case from Beier v. Colvin

using the term production checker

Summary of this case from Larry T. R. v. Kijakazi
Case details for

Schassar v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:STEFANY L. SCHASSAR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Oct 5, 2009

Citations

Case No: 08-2546-JWL (D. Kan. Oct. 5, 2009)

Citing Cases

Odum v. Colvin

Moreover, claimants should not be permitted to scan the record for implied or unexplained conflicts between…

Lee v. Colvin

... claimants should not be permitted to scan the record for implied or unexplained conflicts between the…