From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Savall v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 20, 2019
173 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Summary

In Savall v New York City Tr. Auth. (173 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2019]), the First Department affirmed the denial of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on liability, explaining that triable issues of fact existed as to how the accident occurred since plaintiff and defendant provided conflicting versions of the accident and there were issues of fact as to whether defendant was negligent as well, pointed out Sunbelt Rentals (seeid.).

Summary of this case from Thorsen v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.

Opinion

9670 Index 302008/15

06-20-2019

Guy SAVALL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant–Respondent, Rodney Campbell, Defendant.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellant. Lawrence Heisler, New York City Transit Authority, Brooklyn, (Alison Estess of counsel), for respondent.


Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellant.

Lawrence Heisler, New York City Transit Authority, Brooklyn, (Alison Estess of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Richter, Kahn, Singh, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered on or about September 27, 2018, which denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff's motion was properly denied in this action for personal injuries sustained in a collision between defendants' bus and plaintiff's vehicle. Triable issues of fact exist as to how the accident occurred since plaintiff and defendant Campbell provided conflicting versions of the accident (see e.g. Hedian v. MTLR Corp., 169 A.D.3d 620, 92 N.Y.S.3d 880 [1st Dept. 2019] ). Plaintiff's argument that Campbell's version of the accident should be rejected because the affidavit he submitted was a self-serving attempt to defeat summary judgment is unavailing. The discrepancies in the affidavit and Campbell's deposition testimony cited by plaintiff are not so fundamental as to provide a basis for discrediting Campbell's version of the accident.

Furthermore, the motion court did not impose on plaintiff the burden to prove the absence of his own comparative fault (see Rodriguez v. City of New York, 31 N.Y.3d 312, 76 N.Y.S.3d 898, 101 N.E.3d 366 [2018] ). Rather, the court properly found plaintiff did not conclusively establish that Campbell was negligent. Campbell's version of the accident exonerated him and attributed the accident exclusively to plaintiff's negligence in trying to squeeze between the bus and the stopped cars at the intersection. Thus, it is not a question of whether plaintiff's conduct was also negligent, but there are triable issues of fact as to whether or not Campbell was negligent at all (see Ugarriza v. Schmeider, 46 N.Y.2d 471, 474, 414 N.Y.S.2d 304, 386 N.E.2d 1324 [1979] ).


Summaries of

Savall v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 20, 2019
173 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

In Savall v New York City Tr. Auth. (173 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2019]), the First Department affirmed the denial of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on liability, explaining that triable issues of fact existed as to how the accident occurred since plaintiff and defendant provided conflicting versions of the accident and there were issues of fact as to whether defendant was negligent as well, pointed out Sunbelt Rentals (seeid.).

Summary of this case from Thorsen v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Case details for

Savall v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

Case Details

Full title:Guy Savall, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. New York City Transit Authority…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 20, 2019

Citations

173 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
102 N.Y.S.3d 589
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 4999

Citing Cases

Troncoso v. Iqbal

Accordingly, the record does not "conclusively establish that [Defendant] was negligent" as Defendant's…

Thorsen v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.

Sunbelt Rentals also points out that, since Cartagena's affidavit stated he never saw anyone in the crosswalk…