From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 14, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0714 JAM KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)

Summary

upholding ALJ's decision where the claimant was "limited to simple, repetitive tasks with limited social interaction"

Summary of this case from Schlyter v. Berryhill

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0714 JAM KJM.

October 14, 2008


ORDER


This Social Security action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, et seq., and Local Rule 72-302.

On September 2, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 2, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or remand is denied; and

3. The Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment is granted.


Summaries of

Sanders v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 14, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0714 JAM KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)

upholding ALJ's decision where the claimant was "limited to simple, repetitive tasks with limited social interaction"

Summary of this case from Schlyter v. Berryhill
Case details for

Sanders v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ANITA SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 14, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0714 JAM KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)

Citing Cases

Schlyter v. Berryhill

Plaintiff again cites no authority for her position that such an RFC limitation is erroneous. However, like…