From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saintsing v. Steinbach Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 23, 1949
2 N.J. 304 (N.J. 1949)

Summary

holding that employee disabled as a result of smallpox vaccination was covered by workers' compensation insurance based on evidence that prevention of smallpox among the employees benefitted the employer who had strongly urged employees to take the vaccine

Summary of this case from 88 Op. Att'y Gen. 120

Opinion

Argued May 16, 1949 —

Decided May 23, 1949.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. George F. Lahey, Jr. ( Messrs. Lahey Cockeler, attorneys) argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Isidor Kalisch ( Mr. Mortimer Wald, attorney) argued the cause for the respondent.


The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Saintsing v. Steinbach Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 23, 1949
2 N.J. 304 (N.J. 1949)

holding that employee disabled as a result of smallpox vaccination was covered by workers' compensation insurance based on evidence that prevention of smallpox among the employees benefitted the employer who had strongly urged employees to take the vaccine

Summary of this case from 88 Op. Att'y Gen. 120
Case details for

Saintsing v. Steinbach Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARY SAINTSING, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. STEINBACH COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 23, 1949

Citations

2 N.J. 304 (N.J. 1949)
66 A.2d 158

Citing Cases

Complitano v. Steel Alloy Tank Co.

The primary thesis of appellant is that he is entitled to a recovery because the recreational activity in…

Barbarise v. Overlook Hospital Assn

"* * * In drawing that line the courts have not rested on any legalistic formula but have sought to apply the…