From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ryder v. Royal

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 28, 2016
137 S. Ct. 498 (2016)

Summary

finding that "counsel's decision not to investigate or present mitigating evidence was completely determined by petitioner and was within the realm of reasonable tactical decisions."

Summary of this case from Hugueley v. Westbrooks

Opinion

No. 16–5970.

11-28-2016

James Chandler RYDER, petitioner, v. Terry ROYAL, Warden.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Ryder v. Royal

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 28, 2016
137 S. Ct. 498 (2016)

finding that "counsel's decision not to investigate or present mitigating evidence was completely determined by petitioner and was within the realm of reasonable tactical decisions."

Summary of this case from Hugueley v. Westbrooks
Case details for

Ryder v. Royal

Case Details

Full title:James Chandler RYDER, petitioner, v. Terry ROYAL, Warden.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Nov 28, 2016

Citations

137 S. Ct. 498 (2016)

Citing Cases

Hugueley v. Westbrooks

Further, there is no indication that counsel was ineffective for following defendant's wishes in not…