From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rumph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 13, 1988
527 So. 2d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding appellant's 3.850 motion facially insufficient to raise any fundamental error and that the procedural error complained of occurred during trial and should have been raised on appeal from the judgment of conviction

Summary of this case from Patton v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 87-1301.

June 8, 1988. Rehearing Denied July 13, 1988.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County; L. Page Haddock, Judge.

James W. Rumph, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Appellant's rule 3.850 motion is facially insufficient to raise any fundamental error. The procedural error complained of occurred during trial and should have been raised on appeal from the judgment of conviction.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Rumph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 13, 1988
527 So. 2d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

finding appellant's 3.850 motion facially insufficient to raise any fundamental error and that the procedural error complained of occurred during trial and should have been raised on appeal from the judgment of conviction

Summary of this case from Patton v. State
Case details for

Rumph v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES W. RUMPH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 13, 1988

Citations

527 So. 2d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Patton v. State

"A summary or conclusory allegation is insufficient to allow the trial court to examine the specific…

1 Citing Cases