From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouse v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Feb 4, 2010
CASE NO.: 8:08-cv-2281-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2010)

Summary

finding the plaintiff did not meet Listing 1.04A when the radiologist provided an equivocal statement that he could not "exclude resultant nerve root compression"

Summary of this case from Aldao v. Colvin

Opinion

CASE NO.: 8:08-cv-2281-T-23TBM.

February 4, 2010


ORDER


On January 19, 2010, Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun, III, issued a report (Doc. 16)(1) finding that the decision of the Commissioner is neither supported by substantial evidence nor in accord with the correct legal standard and (2) recommending reversal of the Commissioner's decision and remand of this action for further proceedings. Having received no objection to the report and recommendation, the report and recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this action is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the report and recommendation. The Clerk is directed to (1) enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, (2) terminate any pending motion, and (3) close the case.

ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Rouse v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Feb 4, 2010
CASE NO.: 8:08-cv-2281-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2010)

finding the plaintiff did not meet Listing 1.04A when the radiologist provided an equivocal statement that he could not "exclude resultant nerve root compression"

Summary of this case from Aldao v. Colvin
Case details for

Rouse v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN M. ROUSE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Feb 4, 2010

Citations

CASE NO.: 8:08-cv-2281-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2010)

Citing Cases

Rouse v. Astrue

Plaintiff later filed a civil action in federal district court. See Rouse v. Astrue, No. 8:08-cv-2281-T-23TBM…

Cooper v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Compare, e.g., Leibig v. Barnhart, 243 F. App'x 699, 702 (3rd Cir. 2007) (finding that Listing 1.04A…