holding that an individual supervisor who does not otherwise qualify as an employer cannot be held liable for a violation of Title VII
Summary of this case from Maxwell v. KightNo. 94-404.
November 28, 1994.
C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 F. 3d 1108.
holding that an individual supervisor who does not otherwise qualify as an employer cannot be held liable for a violation of Title VII
Summary of this case from Maxwell v. Kightapproving attorney time records that "included the date, the attorney, the time expended, and a general statement of work done"
Summary of this case from Grant Family Farms v. Liqua-Dryinterpreting similar agency language in Title VII and finding that it imposed liability only on individuals who independently meet the definition of employer
Summary of this case from Seal v. Gateway Companies, Inc.interpreting similar agency language in Title VII and finding that it imposed liability only on individuals who independently meet the definition of employer
Summary of this case from Seal v. Gateway Companies, Inc.discussing definition of "employer" under FMLA
Summary of this case from Cantrell v. Bauhaus, U.S.A., Inc.Full title:ROTH v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 28, 1994
See Commonwealth v. Fourteen Thousand Two Hundred Dollars, 421 Mass. 1, 7 (1995), quoting United States v.…
Colbert v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Title VII does not permit the imposition of liability upon individuals, even those functioning in a…