From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 16, 2019
920 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 2019)

Summary

granting rehearing en banc and proscribing citation to the three-judge panel disposition "as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit"

Summary of this case from Cardenas v. Neven

Opinion

No. 16-16533

04-16-2019

Ronald ROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WILLIAMS, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Nevada, Respondents-Appellees.


ORDER

:Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Miller and Bade did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Ross v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 16, 2019
920 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 2019)

granting rehearing en banc and proscribing citation to the three-judge panel disposition "as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit"

Summary of this case from Cardenas v. Neven
Case details for

Ross v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:RONALD ROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WILLIAMS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 16, 2019

Citations

920 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 2019)

Citing Cases

Ross v. Williams

Ross v. Williams , 896 F.3d 958, 972–73 (9th Cir. 2018). We granted rehearing en banc, Ross v. Williams , 920…

Rivers v. United States

Within the Ninth Circuit, however, the relation back doctrine for habeas claims remains murky. See, e.g.,…