In Ross v. Terry (63 N.Y. 613) the rule of implied warranty on the part of the vendor was applied to the sale of a bond and mortgage, which were usurious and void, but the defendant knew it at the time of the sale.
Summary of this case from McClure v. Central Trust Co.Argued September 30, 1875
Decided October 8, 1875
W.H. McDougall for the appellant.
N.A. Halbert for the respondent.
FOLGER, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Ross v. Terry (63 N.Y. 613) the rule of implied warranty on the part of the vendor was applied to the sale of a bond and mortgage, which were usurious and void, but the defendant knew it at the time of the sale.
Summary of this case from McClure v. Central Trust Co.Full title:JOHN H. ROSS, Respondent, v . EDWIN TERRY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 8, 1875
The complaint alleges that the bond and mortgage were assigned by Larkin to Edward H.M. Roehr and by the…
Oldfield v. Vassar CollegeThe defendant could not have been compelled to take the securities, but could have maintained an action…