From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosner v. Textile Binding Trimming Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1949
275 App. Div. 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Summary

In Rosner v. Textile Binding Trimming Co. (275 App. Div. 760, revd. 300 N.Y. 319) and Joanette Juniors v. Board of Home Missions of Cong. Christian Churches (273 App. Div. 999, affd. 298 N.Y. 826) complaints by tenants for damages were dismissed because they had vacated the premises before any proceeding had been instituted and so had not been technically dispossessed.

Summary of this case from Edward Tarr, Inc. v. Phoenix Publications, Inc.

Opinion

April 19, 1949.

Present — Dore, J.P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [ 193 Misc. 653.] [See post, p. 822.]


Judgment unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint denied. No opinion.


Summaries of

Rosner v. Textile Binding Trimming Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1949
275 App. Div. 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

In Rosner v. Textile Binding Trimming Co. (275 App. Div. 760, revd. 300 N.Y. 319) and Joanette Juniors v. Board of Home Missions of Cong. Christian Churches (273 App. Div. 999, affd. 298 N.Y. 826) complaints by tenants for damages were dismissed because they had vacated the premises before any proceeding had been instituted and so had not been technically dispossessed.

Summary of this case from Edward Tarr, Inc. v. Phoenix Publications, Inc.
Case details for

Rosner v. Textile Binding Trimming Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MOE ROSNER et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of RAINBOW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Edward Tarr, Inc. v. Phoenix Publications, Inc.

Subdivision (k) of section 8 provides for damages if the prospective tenant fails to occupy the store thirty…