From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosiak v. U.S. Dept. of Army

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 3, 1988
845 F.2d 1014 (3d Cir. 1988)

Summary

finding genuine issue of fact as to whether plaintiff's refusal to work the same shift as a supervisor who was allegedly harassing plaintiff constituted statutorily protected opposition to unlawful employment practice, thereby precluding summary judgment on retaliation claim

Summary of this case from Funai v. Brownlee

Opinion

No. 87-5691.

March 3, 1988.

M.D.Pa., Conaboy, J., 679 F.Supp. 444.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Rosiak v. U.S. Dept. of Army

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 3, 1988
845 F.2d 1014 (3d Cir. 1988)

finding genuine issue of fact as to whether plaintiff's refusal to work the same shift as a supervisor who was allegedly harassing plaintiff constituted statutorily protected opposition to unlawful employment practice, thereby precluding summary judgment on retaliation claim

Summary of this case from Funai v. Brownlee

denying defendant's motion for summary judgment on retaliation claim when plaintiff was fired for refusing to work certain shifts with sexually harassing supervisor

Summary of this case from Gardner v. CLC of Pascagoula, L.L.C.
Case details for

Rosiak v. U.S. Dept. of Army

Case Details

Full title:Rosiak v. U.S. Dept. of Army

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 3, 1988

Citations

845 F.2d 1014 (3d Cir. 1988)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Hirschfeld

A number of courts have held that this means that a person can either proceed pro se or represented by an…

Taylor v. Garrett

Although section 501 specifically addresses employment of the handicapped by federal agencies, and section…