From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenkrantz v. Standard Motor Service Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1917
181 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Opinion

November, 1917.


Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, because of the inconsistency of the verdict against the alleged principal (liable only under the rule of respondeat superior), with no finding against the driver of the automobile. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Rosenkrantz v. Standard Motor Service Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1917
181 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for

Rosenkrantz v. Standard Motor Service Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA ROSENKRANTZ, Respondent, v. STANDARD MOTOR SERVICE COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1917

Citations

181 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Citing Cases

ARBERMAN v. RUPP BROTHERS MOTOR SALES CORPORATION

The original verdict was inconsistent and should have been set aside. ( Pangburn v. Buick Motor Co., 211 N.Y.…