From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ARBERMAN v. RUPP BROTHERS MOTOR SALES CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

December, 1931.


Order of Appellate Term affirming order and judgment of the Municipal Court, and said order and judgment, reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event. The original verdict was inconsistent and should have been set aside. ( Pangburn v. Buick Motor Co., 211 N.Y. 228; Cohen v. Wiener, Inc., 179 App. Div. 902: Rosenkrantz v. Standard Motor Service Company, Inc., 181 id. 886.) And the trial court was without power to correct it. ( Porret v. City of New York, 252 N.Y. 208, 211.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

ARBERMAN v. RUPP BROTHERS MOTOR SALES CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

ARBERMAN v. RUPP BROTHERS MOTOR SALES CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:MAX ARBERMAN, an Infant, by IGNATZ ARBERMAN, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)