From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosasco v. Cella

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 13, 2015
124 A.D.3d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

01-13-2015

Robert ROSASCO, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. John CELLA, as Administrator of the Estate of Walter Rosasco, Deceased, et al., Defendants–Appellants, Liana Smith, et al., Defendants.

Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP, New York (Adam M. Felsenstein of counsel), for appellants. Rafferty & Redlisky, LLP, Pelham (Robert G. Rafferty of counsel), for respondents.


Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP, New York (Adam M. Felsenstein of counsel), for appellants.

Rafferty & Redlisky, LLP, Pelham (Robert G. Rafferty of counsel), for respondents.

Tom, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Saxe, Kapnick, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered on or about February 20, 2014, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs' motion for partition and sale of the subject property, and ordered that the proceeds be held in escrow pending final resolution of the proceeding in Surrogate's Court, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The motion was properly granted as plaintiffs showed their ownership interest in the property at issue, and that it would be prejudicial to physically divide it (see RPAPL 901 ; Manganiello v. Lipman, 74 A.D.3d 667, 668, 905 N.Y.S.2d 153 [1st Dept.2010] ). Because the appraisal annexed as an exhibit to the amended verified complaint was prepared on behalf of defendants, by their agent authorized to make such a statement, it was a party admission (see Georges v. American Export Lines, 77 A.D.2d 26, 33, 432 N.Y.S.2d 165 [1st Dept.1980] ; Brusca v. El Al Israel Airlines, 75 A.D.2d 798, 800, 427 N.Y.S.2d 505 [2d Dept.1980] ).

Although there is a related proceeding in Surrogate's Court, that proceeding does not involve partition, and the escrowing of the proceeds of the sale avoided any risk of inconsistent judgments. Furthermore, plaintiffs' pursuit of litigation in various fora with regard to their rights to the property at issue did not rise to the level of "immoral" or "unconscionable" conduct that would give rise to a defense of unclean hands ( Columbo v. Columbo, 50 A.D.3d 617, 619, 856 N.Y.S.2d 159 [2d Dept.2008] ).


Summaries of

Rosasco v. Cella

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 13, 2015
124 A.D.3d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Rosasco v. Cella

Case Details

Full title:Robert Rosasco, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. John Cella, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 13, 2015

Citations

124 A.D.3d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
1 N.Y.S.3d 71
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 309

Citing Cases

Moskowitz v. Tory Burch LLC

In a related proceeding brought by TBLLC, this Court reversed an order that had granted TBLLC a judicial…