From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jan 31, 2013
No. 06-12-00167-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2013)

Summary

removing improperly imposed attorney's fees but leaving court costs

Summary of this case from Hernandez-Prado v. State

Opinion

No. 06-12-00167-CR

01-31-2013

ALAN MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 241st District Court

Smith County, Texas

Trial Court No. 241-0867-12


Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In Smith County, Texas, Alan Michael Rodriguez was indicted on one count of engaging in organized criminal activity. Rodriguez entered an open plea of guilty. The trial court, after hearing argument regarding punishment, assessed a sentence of thirty-seven years' confinement. The trial court ordered Rodriguez to pay court costs of $574.00, which included $300.00 for attorney's fees.

On appeal, Rodriguez argues that the trial court erred in assessing attorney's fees because he was indigent. To its credit, the State agrees with Rodriguez.

Article 26.05 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that the costs of appointed counsel may be imposed against a defendant if the court finds that the defendant "has financial resources that enable him to offset in part or in whole the costs of the legal services provided." TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art 26.05(g) (West Supp. 2012). Where the record fails to establish and support a defendant's financial ability, a trial court errs if it orders the reimbursement of attorney's fees. Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

Because he was indigent, the trial court appointed counsel for Rodriguez. The record does not reflect a change in Rodriguez's indigent status. There is also no evidence in the record of Rodriguez's ability to pay any or all of the costs for his appointed counsel. Therefore, the trial court erred in assessing $574.00 in costs, and we modify the judgment to correctly reflect a total of $274.00 in court costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b).

Rodriguez remains liable for other administrative costs incurred. Williams v. State, 332 S.W.3d 694, 700 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, pet. denied).

We affirm the judgment, as modified.

Jack Carter

Justice
Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jan 31, 2013
No. 06-12-00167-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2013)

removing improperly imposed attorney's fees but leaving court costs

Summary of this case from Hernandez-Prado v. State
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALAN MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

No. 06-12-00167-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2013)

Citing Cases

Washington v. State

Thus, the assessment of the $300.00 in attorney's fees was erroneous and should be redacted. See generally…

Morsman v. State

Thus, the assessment of the $350.00 in attorney's fees was erroneous and should be deleted. See Rodriguez v.…