interpreting prior version of Rule 61; "Rule 61 provided that claims that could have been raised on direct appeal could not be asserted in postconviction relief proceedings."
Summary of this case from State v. StanfordNo. 152, 2016
10-13-2016
Brandon Robinson, Defendant-Below, Appellant, v. State of Delaware, Plaintiff-Below, Appellee.
AFFIRMED.
interpreting prior version of Rule 61; "Rule 61 provided that claims that could have been raised on direct appeal could not be asserted in postconviction relief proceedings."
Summary of this case from State v. Stanfordinterpreting prior version of Rule 61; "Rule 61 provided that claims that could have been raised on direct appeal could not be asserted in postconviction relief proceedings."
Summary of this case from State v. StanfordFull title:Brandon Robinson, Defendant-Below, Appellant, v. State of Delaware…
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.
Date published: Oct 13, 2016
Glandton identified the man as a person he knew as "RC" after viewing pictures on Facebook. See Robinson v.…
State v. StanfordRule 61(i)(3). See, e.g., Robinson v. State, 149 A.3d 518, 2016 WL 5957289, at *2 (Del. Oct. 13, 2016)…