From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rizzo v. Rock

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 13, 2009
08-CV-269 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2009)

Summary

finding jeopardy did not attach to guilty plea because plea agreement was necessarily conditioned on judge's later review and acceptance of information in presentence report

Summary of this case from Constant v. Martuscello

Opinion

08-CV-269.

February 13, 2009


ORDER


This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 2, 2008, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On December 12, 2008, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that te petition be denied.

Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on February 6, 2009 and respondent filed a memorandum in reply thereto.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions and hearing argument from the parties, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

The Court finds that petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore denies his motion for a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rizzo v. Rock

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 13, 2009
08-CV-269 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2009)

finding jeopardy did not attach to guilty plea because plea agreement was necessarily conditioned on judge's later review and acceptance of information in presentence report

Summary of this case from Constant v. Martuscello

finding double jeopardy not implicated where trial court's acceptance of guilty plea was implicitly conditioned on judge's review of pre-sentence report

Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. Conway
Case details for

Rizzo v. Rock

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTINE R. RIZZO, 03-B-0218 Plaintiff, v. DAVID ROCK, Superintendent…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Feb 13, 2009

Citations

08-CV-269 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2009)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Phillips

Johnson, 467 U.S. at 501, 104 S.Ct. 2536 (holding that defendant's subsequent prosecution was not barred by…

Smith v. Phillips

Johnson, 467 U.S. at 501 (holding that defendant's subsequent prosecution was not barred by the Double…