From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivers v. Walker

U.S.
Jan 1, 1784
1 U.S. 81 (1784)

Summary

In Rivers v. Walker, 1 Dall. Rep. 81. notice, in the case of referees, is directed to be given to the party; and the reason is stronger in the present instance, as the defendant lives at a great distance, and the attorney ought not to be put to the trouble and expence of transmitting the notice.

Summary of this case from Leffee v. Geyger

Opinion

JUNE TERM, 1784.

For a contrary practice, the report, in the present instance, was set aside, on motion of Lewis, in behalf of the defendant, opposed by Ingersol, for the plaintiff.


IT was ruled in this cause, that notice of the time and place of the meeting of referrees, must be served on the party himself, and not on his attorney; unless it be otherwise specified in the rule of referrence.


Summaries of

Rivers v. Walker

U.S.
Jan 1, 1784
1 U.S. 81 (1784)

In Rivers v. Walker, 1 Dall. Rep. 81. notice, in the case of referees, is directed to be given to the party; and the reason is stronger in the present instance, as the defendant lives at a great distance, and the attorney ought not to be put to the trouble and expence of transmitting the notice.

Summary of this case from Leffee v. Geyger
Case details for

Rivers v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:RIVERS versus WALKER

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1784

Citations

1 U.S. 81 (1784)

Citing Cases

Leffee v. Geyger

But, for the defendant, it was contended, that the notice of the rule should have been given to the party,…