From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richey v. Obenland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Aug 12, 2013
CASE NO. C13-5231 BHS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 12, 2013)

Summary

adopting recommendation that "[p]ursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3, the petitions should be transferred to the Ninth Circuit . . . ."

Summary of this case from De Adams v. Hedgpeth

Opinion

CASE NO. C13-5231 BHS

08-12-2013

THOMAS WS RICHEY, Petitioner, v. MIKE OBENLAND, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 22), and Plaintiff's objections to the R&R (Dkt. 23).

On June 17, Judge Strombom issued the R&R recommending that the Court transfer Petitioner's petition to the Ninth Circuit because it is a second or successive petition. Dkt. 22. On June 25, 2013, Petitioner filed objections. Dkt. 23. Upon review of the pleadings, the Court finds that Petitioner's objections are without merit because the instant petition contains identical issues to those presented in Case No. C13-5043BHS.

Therefore, the Court having considered the R&R, Petitioner's objections, and the remaining record, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED; and

(2) This petition shall be TRANSFERRED to the Ninth Circuit as a second or successive petition; and

(3) This case shall be closed.

_________________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Richey v. Obenland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Aug 12, 2013
CASE NO. C13-5231 BHS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 12, 2013)

adopting recommendation that "[p]ursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3, the petitions should be transferred to the Ninth Circuit . . . ."

Summary of this case from De Adams v. Hedgpeth
Case details for

Richey v. Obenland

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS WS RICHEY, Petitioner, v. MIKE OBENLAND, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Aug 12, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C13-5231 BHS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 12, 2013)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. United States

To resolve such a dispute, the Court must make a legal determination subject to de novo review and consider…

De Adams v. Hedgpeth

"); Blanco v. Valenzuela, 2014 WL 111453 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2014) (Walter, J.) (same); Parham v. Diaz, 2013…