Summary
ordering inmate to spend 30 days in disciplinary confinement after misconduct
Summary of this case from Tejada v. DaleOpinion
No. 2057CD07.
June 11, 2008.
Chester County 06-01521.
Affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Richardson v. Yancik
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 11, 2008
952 A.2d 753 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 2008)
Summaries of
Richardson v. Yancik
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 11, 2008
952 A.2d 753 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 2008)
ordering inmate to spend 30 days in disciplinary confinement after misconduct
Summary of this case from Tejada v. DaleCase details for
Richardson v. Yancik
Case Details
Full title:Richardson v. Yancik
Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jun 11, 2008
Citations
952 A.2d 753 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 2008)
Citing Cases
Tejada v. Dale
37 Pa. Code § 95.240. While a violation of this provision is not often alleged, those Courts that have…