Summary
comparing Hernandez and finding no basis for remand when ALJ's RFC was consistent with state agency physicians
Summary of this case from Arrington v. SaulOpinion
CV 111-011
06-12-2012
CATHERINE V. RHONEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED, this civil action is CLOSED, and a final judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of the Commissioner.
SO ORDERED this __ day of June, 2012, at Augusta, Georgia.
______________________
HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA