From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 21, 2004
874 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 3D04-526.

Opinion filed April 21, 2004. Rehearing Denied June 4, 2004.

An Appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge, Lower Tribunal No. 89-36248.

Royce M. Reed, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ.


Royce Reed appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction DNA testing pursuant to section 925.11(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2002), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We affirm the trial court's denial because "[a] defendant who enters a plea of guilty or nolo contendere may not seek postconviction DNA testing based on the language of the statute." Smith v. State, 854 So.2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (citing Stewart v. State, 840 So.2d 438 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Reed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 21, 2004
874 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Reed v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROYCE M. REED, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 21, 2004

Citations

874 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

People v. Byrdsong

The court in Weeks v State (supra at 46) found although the statute referred to the "time of trial" there was…

Fuentes v. State

The above quoted colloquy clearly indicates that the defendant voluntarily entered a plea of guilty to each…