From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ratliff v. Hedgepeth

United States District Court, C.D. California
May 4, 2010
Case No. ED CV 07-627-RSWL(RC) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 07-627-RSWL(RC).

May 4, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY


Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, as well as petitioner's objections, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing the action with prejudice.

This Court finds an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and petitioner has not made a substantial showing that he has been denied a constitutional right, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation; thus, a certificate of appealability should not issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) and Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 1604, 146 L. Ed. 2d 542 (2000); Mayfield v. Calderon, 229 F.3d 895, 900 (9th Cir. 2000).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and Judgment by the United States mail on petitioner.

DATED: May 4, 2010


Summaries of

Ratliff v. Hedgepeth

United States District Court, C.D. California
May 4, 2010
Case No. ED CV 07-627-RSWL(RC) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Ratliff v. Hedgepeth

Case Details

Full title:DE'VERON J. RATLIFF, aka DEVERON JACQUES RATLIFF, aka CHRISTOPHER HOOPER…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. California

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

Case No. ED CV 07-627-RSWL(RC) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2010)

Citing Cases

Jernigan v. Edward

"This includes a duty to investigate the prosecution's case and to follow up on any exculpatory evidence."…

Herrera v. Biter

Second, even setting aside the Rodriguez evidence, there was sufficient evidence "establishing a 'pattern of…