From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rasmussen v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1950
93 N.E.2d 344 (N.Y. 1950)

Summary

In Rasmussen v. City of New York (301 N.Y. 532), we held that the statutory phrase "salary provided in the budget" (Local Laws, 1942, No. 45 of City of New York) meant not the salary actually and in fact provided in the budget, namely, $2,700, but rather the salary which under applicable law the plaintiff employee was lawfully entitled to have provided therein, namely, $3,180.

Summary of this case from Mark v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y

Opinion

Argued April 10, 1950

Decided May 18, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, BOTEIN, J.

John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel ( Seymour B. Quel and Angela Parisi of counsel), for appellant.

David A. Savage and Donald A. Savage for respondent.



Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Rasmussen v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1950
93 N.E.2d 344 (N.Y. 1950)

In Rasmussen v. City of New York (301 N.Y. 532), we held that the statutory phrase "salary provided in the budget" (Local Laws, 1942, No. 45 of City of New York) meant not the salary actually and in fact provided in the budget, namely, $2,700, but rather the salary which under applicable law the plaintiff employee was lawfully entitled to have provided therein, namely, $3,180.

Summary of this case from Mark v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y
Case details for

Rasmussen v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:PETER C. RASMUSSEN, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 18, 1950

Citations

93 N.E.2d 344 (N.Y. 1950)
93 N.E.2d 344

Citing Cases

Mark v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y

We should not strain to spell out such intention. In Rasmussen v. City of New York ( 301 N.Y. 532), we held…

Brunner v. City of New York

In like manner, the plaintiffs, William J. Crossin, Samuel Harris, Frank M. Lombardi, Joseph Romayne and…