finding "strongly negative" evaluations of an assistant principal were "so harsh as to be likely to persuade any other school board not to hire plaintiff as a supervisor"
Summary of this case from Singhaviroj v. FairfieldNo. 96-1086.
February 24, 1997, October TERM, 1996.
C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 95 F. 3d 339.
finding "strongly negative" evaluations of an assistant principal were "so harsh as to be likely to persuade any other school board not to hire plaintiff as a supervisor"
Summary of this case from Singhaviroj v. Fairfieldrejecting a Delaware River Port Authority Commissioner's argument that his five-year term, which exceeded the term of the Governor, evidenced the General Assembly's intent that the Governor's power to remove him was limited, and finding “the difference in the length of terms of office ... irrelevant.”
Summary of this case from Arneson v. Wolfprecluding Army officer's claim of racial discrimination
Summary of this case from Brown v. U.S.noting that a state's decision not to rehire a terminated employee does not alone amount to a deprivation of liberty
Summary of this case from Sutera v. Transportation Security Administrationnoting that Pennsylvania law is consistent with federal law on this issue, in the context of construing an interstate compact between Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Summary of this case from Venesky v. RidgeFull title:RANDALL v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 24, 1997
But not all employment decisions implicate an employee's liberty interest. See Donato v. Plainview-Old…
Wilcox v. Newark Valley Central School Dists a "stigma plus" claim — requires a plaintiff to allege "(1) the utterance of a statement sufficiently…