From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramsey v. Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 2, 2014
Case No. CV 13-1421-DSF (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2014)

Summary

presuming nearly identical superior court order adjudicated claim on the merits

Summary of this case from Gupta v. Beard

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-1421-DSF (DTB)

06-02-2014

MARC LOKEN RAMSEY, Petitioner, v. TIM PEREZ, Warden, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

__________

DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ramsey v. Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 2, 2014
Case No. CV 13-1421-DSF (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2014)

presuming nearly identical superior court order adjudicated claim on the merits

Summary of this case from Gupta v. Beard
Case details for

Ramsey v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:MARC LOKEN RAMSEY, Petitioner, v. TIM PEREZ, Warden, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 2, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 13-1421-DSF (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2014)

Citing Cases

Gupta v. Beard

Lodg. No. 19. These claims were summarily denied by the California Court of Appeal and California Supreme…

Griffith v. Alfaro

Such a claim generally does not merit federal intrusion. Estelle, 502 U.S. at 63; see also Ramsey v. Perez,…