From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Protano v. 16 North Chatsworth Avenue Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.).


Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve and file an amended complaint (see, Nassau County v. Incorporated Vil. of Roslyn, 182 A.D.2d 678).

The Supreme Court properly struck the defendant's jury demand (see, JIHL Assocs. v. Frank, 107 A.D.2d 662; Lindenwood Realty Co. v. Feldman, 72 Misc.2d 68, 69 [Gulotta, J., dissenting], revd 40 A.D.2d 855, on dissenting opn at App Term).

Miller, J.P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Protano v. 16 North Chatsworth Avenue Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Protano v. 16 North Chatsworth Avenue Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GENEROSA G. PROTANO, Respondent, v. 16 NORTH CHATSWORTH AVENUE CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 345

Citing Cases

Agora Gourmet Foods Inc. v. Edge

Section 26.01 of the Contract provides that "[t]he parties hereto do hereby agree that trial by jury in any…