Summary
affirming decision of Board in CBM2018-00034
Summary of this case from Promptu Sys. Corp. v. Comcast Corp.Opinion
2022-1093
01-16-2024
PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Appellant v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Appellee
JACOB ADAM SCHROEDER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &Dunner, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA GOLDBERG, Washington, DC; JOSEPH MICHAEL SCHAFFNER, Reston, VA. MARK ANDREW PERRY, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOSHUA HALPERN; IAN ANTHONY MOORE, New York, NY; JAMES L. DAY, JR., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00344.
JACOB ADAM SCHROEDER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &Dunner, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA GOLDBERG, Washington, DC; JOSEPH MICHAEL SCHAFFNER, Reston, VA.
MARK ANDREW PERRY, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOSHUA HALPERN; IAN ANTHONY MOORE, New York, NY;
JAMES L. DAY, JR., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA.
JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM.
MOORE, Chief Judge, PROST and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.