From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prichard v. 164 Ludlow Corp.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
Dec 12, 2006
14 Misc. 3d 1202 (N.Y. Misc. 2006)

Summary

noting that the plaintiffs alleged that they "purchased stock" in "19[9]7"

Summary of this case from Panos v. Universal Forest Prods.

Opinion

No. 600828/060.

December 12, 2006.


Corporations — Disregarding Corporate Entity. Fraud — Fraud in Inducement.


Summaries of

Prichard v. 164 Ludlow Corp.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
Dec 12, 2006
14 Misc. 3d 1202 (N.Y. Misc. 2006)

noting that the plaintiffs alleged that they "purchased stock" in "19[9]7"

Summary of this case from Panos v. Universal Forest Prods.
Case details for

Prichard v. 164 Ludlow Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Robert Prichard, JENNIFER BOCCIO, and MARTIN GRAVES, Plaintiffs, v. 164…

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County

Date published: Dec 12, 2006

Citations

14 Misc. 3d 1202 (N.Y. Misc. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 52381
831 N.Y.S.2d 362

Citing Cases

Small v. Arch Capital Group, Ltd.

Defendants argue that "the allegations of Count IV are grounded in fabricated "express agreement[s],"…

PARRISH v. UNIDISC MUSIC, INC.

Furthermore, the essential elements of a claim for fraud are a misrepresentation or concealment of a material…