commenting that state laws relating to designation of beneficiaries are preempted when an ERISA plan is involved
Summary of this case from Martin Oil v. Philadelphia Life Ins. Co.No. 96-176.
June 9, 1997.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 82 F. 3d 126.
commenting that state laws relating to designation of beneficiaries are preempted when an ERISA plan is involved
Summary of this case from Martin Oil v. Philadelphia Life Ins. Co.Full title:PRESSLEY, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF PRESSLEY, DECEASED v…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 9, 1997
Similarly, those cases in which the state law claim involves "some aspect of the distribution, processing or…
Johns Manville Hourly Emp. 401(K) Plan v. ReimanIn determining the beneficiary under an ERISA plan, the Sixth Circuit "holds that ERISA itself supplies the…