holding that district court acted properly in conducting limited inquiry into jury use of information outside of the record and failing to allow counsel to participate in questioning of the jurors because trial court has wide discretion in deciding how to pursue an inquiry into the effects of extra-record information
Summary of this case from Hall v. StateNo. 87-1307.
March 7, 1988.
ORDER
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 825 F. 2d 1274.
holding that district court acted properly in conducting limited inquiry into jury use of information outside of the record and failing to allow counsel to participate in questioning of the jurors because trial court has wide discretion in deciding how to pursue an inquiry into the effects of extra-record information
Summary of this case from Hall v. StateFull title:PORTO v. ARMCO, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 7, 1988
Stanton v. Gulf Oil Corp., 792 F.2d 432 (4th Cir. 1986) (it is not a violation of ERISA to fail to furnish…
Wheel v. RobinsonIndeed, in United States v. Ianniello, 866 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1989), we remanded for a Remmer posttrial…