From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poplawski v. Gross

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2014
115 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-19

Anna POPLAWSKI, et al., appellants, v. Beth R. GROSS, etc., et. al, respondents, et al., defendants.

Garth Molander, Bohemia, N.Y., for appellants. Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York, N.Y. (Judy C. Selmeci, Kenneth R. Reiser, and Patrick Lawless of counsel), for respondents.


Garth Molander, Bohemia, N.Y., for appellants. Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York, N.Y. (Judy C. Selmeci, Kenneth R. Reiser, and Patrick Lawless of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Iannacci, J.), dated June 5, 2012, which denied, without prejudice to renewal at trial, their motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel certain disclosure.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying, without prejudice to renewal at trial, that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel certain disclosure. The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the defendants failed to provide or make available for inspection any of the materials demanded ( seeCPLR 3124).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit. SKELOS, J.P., DILLON, HALL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Poplawski v. Gross

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2014
115 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Poplawski v. Gross

Case Details

Full title:Anna POPLAWSKI, et al., appellants, v. Beth R. GROSS, etc., et. al…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 19, 2014

Citations

115 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
115 A.D.3d 838
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1734

Citing Cases

Edmundson v. State

Claimant seeks the production of certain documents to support his pending claim by this motion, however, this…